Martin,

question: why in V3 you plan to place *Transfer *account under Equity ?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/edit#

====================================================









*One possible idea would be to allow optional posting dates, like 
this:2020-01-19 * "ONLINE PAYMENT - THANK YOU" ""  Assets:US:BofA:Checking  
-2397.72 USD  2020-01-21 Liabilities:US:Amex:BlueCash  2397.72 USDwhich 
would result in two transactions behind the scenes, like this:2020-01-19 * 
"ONLINE PAYMENT - THANK YOU" ""  Assets:US:BofA:Checking  -2397.72 USD  
Equity:Transfer2020-01-21 * "ONLINE PAYMENT - THANK YOU" ""  
Liabilities:US:Amex:BlueCash  2397.72 USD  Equity:Transfer*  

===================================================

In this case if somebody regularly checks his Net Worth, by performing 
calculation Assets + Liabilities, then on *2020-01-20 *he will all of a 
sudden find, that he now has  *2397.72 USD *less (as they have been moved 
to Equity) and on *2020-01-21 *he will find, that these *2397.72 USD *came 
back, whilst in reality money have just been transferred from Checking 
account to credit card

I your early 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x0qqWGRHi02ef-FtUW172SHkdJ8quOZD-Xli7r4Nl_k/edit#heading=h.v7ixc4fx0f41>
 
document you were planning to place transfer account to *Assets*. Isn't 
this more appropriate?

In my eyes transfer account shall be under *Assets *or *Liabilities*,  in 
this case checking your net worth by using formula *Assets + Liabilities* 
will not produce strange results, whilst your money go from one account to 
another.

Or am I missing something?

Regards.

On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 9:51:45 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:

> Yes, this problem will be fixed in v3. 
> It's annoying me too. I'm currently porting the parser to C++ (almost 
> done) and will make corresponding changes.
> See here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qPdNXaz5zuDQ8M9uoZFyyFis7hA0G55BEfhWhrVBsfc/edit#heading=h.72lcw09z1ob1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:33 AM Aaron Lindsay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Martin, is allowing for different posting dates for different legs of a 
>> transaction natively in beancount something you would consider for v3?
>>
>> It is somewhat of an annoyance that some transactions post to different 
>> accounts on different dates in the real world (credit card payments sent by 
>> billpay from checking account, paper checks mailed from health/dependent 
>> care reimbursement accounts and later deposited, etc.). In beancount v2, 
>> this means you may have to 'lie' to reconcile accounts with conflicting 
>> balance assertions when a transaction needs to be on one side of a balance 
>> boundary in one account and not in the other because a given transaction 
>> can only have one date. Shifting the dates one way or the other can work 
>> around this, but can also involve shifting the dates of unrelated 
>> transactions which also need to be on one side or the other of the balance 
>> assertion.
>>
>> I'm attempting to update my finances more frequently to turn it from a 
>> monthly chore to to a quick daily habit (with a dose of automation for 
>> getting the transactions to the point where I can review them), and I'm 
>> running into issues like this more frequently. It also feels a little wrong 
>> to me to be keeping a record of my finances that differs from my banks' 
>> views of what happened.
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>> p.s. To be clear, I'm guessing I can probably write a plugin to do this, 
>> I'm just wondering if it's something fundamental enough that you would 
>> consider putting support for it into the core of beancount.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Beancount" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/9b869b13-7a10-4aae-a77f-85193a678874n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/9b869b13-7a10-4aae-a77f-85193a678874n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/452422a1-ef69-4785-832f-094cd81bf528n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to