Hi Dan,

Yes, Red Hat and therefore CentOS tend to be using "stable" therefore old 
versions of everything.  I am not even sure there is Python 3 included, if 
it is it is 3.5 or less.   Python 3 is not on one or two of my CentOS 
systems.  That may change with the new version of CentOS, 8, as it is going 
to be ahead of Red Hat much to the consternation of some sysadmins.  If no 
one else is using CentOS, instead of you going through the work of changing 
especially the code, I could hack my setup.py or maybe install a newer gcc 
and just put out a warning to CentOS users.

Regards,

Jonathan

On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 10:06:42 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:

> On 25/02/2021 15:58, Jonathan Salles wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> > 
> > Thanks for replying.  I did mean Python 3.8.2.  I can never find a
> > keyboard that works properly ;>)  The gcc in the work Centos, and
> > probably the home, is gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44).
>
> Uhm... This is a very old GCC! According to the docs, only more recent
> GCC versions default to gnu99 as C standard. I'll what is easier between
> tweaking setup.py without breaking it for other compilers and removing
> gnu99-C features from the C code.
>
> >  I
> > did see a make file in the git repository, is that used for the general
> > process and not the gcc?
>
> It is only used for automating some development tasks.
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
>
> > On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 9:03:55 AM UTC-5 [email protected] 
> wrote:
> > 
> > On 25/02/2021 14:50, Jonathan Salles wrote:
> > > Hello Martin, and all.
> > >
> > > First, thanks Martin for creating and continuing to improve. 
> > Thanks to
> > > all the users and contributors.  Greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > After a bit of a hiatus I am starting to upgrade as I am a bit
> > behind. 
> > > My main use system is a Mac Mini running Mojave or High Sierra (can't
> > > upgrade, too old, stupid Apple).  I have a Macbook Pro running
> > Catalina,
> > > but haven't installed Beancount to that.  
> > >
> > > Trying to install on two CentOS systems, one mine and one at
> > work.  Both
> > > running Centos 7.8 and recently updated.  One has Python 8.1, one has
> > > Python 8.2.
> > 
> > I think you mean Python 3.8.1 or 3.8.2.
> > 
> > >  Both are incurring this error:
> > >     beancount/parser/parser.c: In function ‘strtonl’:
> > >     beancount/parser/parser.c:53:5: error: ‘for’ loop initial
> > > declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
> > >          for (size_t i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
> > >          ^
> > >     beancount/parser/parser.c:53:5: note: use option -std=c99 or
> > > -std=gnu99 to compile your code
> > >     error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
> > >
> > > From the error and some web searching it looks like -std=c99 or
> > > -std=gnu99 needs to be added to the makefile, or I need to set it
> > > somewhere in my gcc options.  In the makefile it would prevent others
> > > from having this issue.
> > 
> > Python extensions are compiled with setuptools, not wit a Makefile,
> > thus
> > the setup.py may require some tweaking, or the code adjusted to do not
> > rely on c99 features.
> > 
> > Which version of GCC is CentOS 7.8 shipping?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Dan
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Beancount" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/0381a8f7-42ce-490c-9b2d-c6ad62fa5fa5n%40googlegroups.com
> > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/0381a8f7-42ce-490c-9b2d-c6ad62fa5fa5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/cc02ffc8-fbe9-4210-bcb2-d7d3d2761898n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to