On 13/07/2021 10:45, John Lee wrote: > The only thing making me hesistate (apart from my existing ledger > file needing attention before I start moving anything) is > performance, so v3 sounds perfect. In my experience the performance of Beancount is more than adequate for regular use cases. Performance is an issue only with very large ledgers that are mostly encountered when stock trading is recorded. Even in these circumstances it is not very problematic to split out old transactions from the work ledger and keep Beancpunt snappy.
Have you tried to use the current release and realized that it is too slow for your use case or are you simply fearing that it may be too slow from comments you read? Cheers, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/05b782bc-6c2a-7f1b-dd38-732dc7632b98%40grinta.net.
