Here you go: https://pypi.org/project/beangulp/
Cheers,
Dan
On 29/05/24 05:47, Martin Blais wrote:
It would be indeed nice if I created a PyPI for it.
I think when the projects got forked from the beancount repo I never did
that.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:19 PM Red S <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Not releases, but just a single release would suffice.
The first release implies the author/maintainer deemed it
release-worthy, which is meaningful when viewed in the context of
the reputation of the author/maintainer. This message
<https://groups.google.com/g/beancount/c/c_NwZGbgOXo/m/qYX-qEtsBAAJ>
explicitly says it’s not ready for a release, and that being a
strong warning. Fair enough if that’s the state of it, but that may
also reasonably interpreted to mean one shouldn’t be coding and
releasing other software against it. Plus, a release would result in
a PyPI package presumably, which is also required for other packages
to depend on it.
Regular releases/commits help signify activity, and are not an ask,
at least from me here.
Does that help clarify?
On Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 7:58:38 PM UTC-7 [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
I mean it does the job, should we make releases just so people
feel like it's changing?
I can commit a diff every month on the readme file if it helps/shrug
On Tue, May 28, 2024, 01:29 Red S <[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2024 at 7:32:52 PM UTC-7
[email protected] wrote:
On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 9:59:14 AM UTC+7 Red S wrote:
Mini rant: I’d love for anyone who writes an
importer to come to the same realization Felipe did,
and *write it using the beangulp API*.
I have several written several importers. I've never
looked at moving them to beangulp. Because when I look
at beangulp's github repository there are no releases,
no commits in 8 months, and the "Status" documentation
says "As of February 2021, the project has just been
forked out of Beancount. Expect some changes to be made
here."
I assume, perhaps incorrectly(?), that if beangulp isn't
in a state to be released yet then it isn't in a state
for me to migrate my importers to it.
I’ve done the same thing for exactly the same reasons, and
thus, beancount_reds_importers
<https://github.com/redstreet/beancount_reds_importers> is
written against bean-{identify, extract, file} in Beancount
v2 instead of beangulp. Good catch, thank you, I should’ve
been more explicit and instead recommended that people write
importers against released code, which in this case is
Beancount v2’s importers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/7332b74a-39c8-476d-83dd-9dae2ed7c864n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/7332b74a-39c8-476d-83dd-9dae2ed7c864n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhP0pW7pxyq4yO%3DxWt_JkffaF3g8k-NTG9bJkiSZzZzqsQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhP0pW7pxyq4yO%3DxWt_JkffaF3g8k-NTG9bJkiSZzZzqsQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/050aa7a3-7a7f-4ee5-8d4a-4d13b84a9e24%40grinta.net.