On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Keith Rarick <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Drew Taylor <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> I'll push a workaround for the posix_fallocate thing today, if
> possible. Then I think you can be up and running.

This message 
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/hackers/2008-11/msg00029.html
makes me suspect that FreeBSD has no efficient equivalent to
posix_fallocate.

I just pushed some dumb but portable code to allocate space. It will
be slow, but it should work. (And I'd be wary of trusting the binlog
code in production right now anyway. I won't release it until I'm
confident that it's reasonably safe.)

If you're not using the binlog at all, then there should be no
performance problem on FreeBSD or other systems that lack
posix_fallocate.

kr

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to