On Oct 29, 2:43 am, Eran Sandler <[email protected]> wrote: > You can use RabbitMQ (http://www.rabbitmq.com), but its a bit more complex > than Beanstalk and uses a standard called AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing > Protocol) that should be a standard to inter-operate between other such > queuing systems such as ActiveMQ (don't know if it also runs on Windows). > > RabbitMQ is written in Erlang, so you'll need the Erlang runtime installed.
On Oct 29, 2:47 am, Cody Caughlan <[email protected]> wrote: > Apache ActiveMQ is Java based so it should run on *nix/Windows just fine. > > http://activemq.apache.org/ > > Its pretty complex, like RabbitMQ Eran, Cody, thanks for the suggestions! I've been aware of RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ, and AMQP, but I'd been hoping to find a way to avoid their intrinsic complexity. Maybe I'm just not very bright, but I don't like the impedance mismatching between job queueing and message queuing. Or maybe it's that I'm just rigid — when I see "message" I think about communication, not about jobs... which is why beanstalk appeals to me. Unfortunately my client's systems are all Windows and are likely to remain Windows for a long time. Thanks! Avi -- Avi Flax » Partner » Arc90 » http://arc90.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
