On Oct 23, 3:49 am, Keith Rarick <[email protected]> wrote: >> How does everyone (especially contributors) feel about potentially >> putting beanstalkd under the MIT license? There's been some interest >> in using beanstalkd where the GPL might be unwelcome.
I'm not a contributor, but as an end user, it is *much* easier to get approval from the powers that be to use a third party tool like beanstalkd if it is covered under an MIT license rather than the GPL. And GPL v3 is even harder than v2. If your goal with the software is to get it widely used, moving it to an MIT based public license would certainly help us in the corporate world. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
