On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:10:29AM +0100, Andreas Bolka wrote: >> I guess it then boils down to how you are about to package beanstalkd >> and for what target audience. > > I'm packaging beanstalkd to satisfy a dependency of flapjack, a service > monitoring framework (think nagios). So the primary use case is indirect users > of beanstalkd, not devs.
The FHS seems pretty clear about this. The "primary" use case doesn't matter; we only care whether any normal users will want to run beanstalkd. By analogy, ping is primarily for admins to diagnose network problems, but it goes in bin because normal users run it too. Having said all that, I won't argue any more if you still want to package it in sbin, but I think beanstalkd's own makefile should stick with bin. kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
