Hi all, I saw the effort to relicense beanstalkd as MIT, which I very much appreciate, but I also wanted to bring up a similar point with the Ruby beanstalk-client gem. This is currently GPL v3, and I can't open- source all the Ruby code that the client would touch. By license anything running in the same interpreter must be GPL, therefore it's even a license conflict to run beanstalk-client in the same interpreter as non-GPL gems.
Would the authors of beanstalk-client be willing to either re-license as MIT (or similar) or dual-license in the same way as Ruby? Best regards, Josh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
