> Once I get issue 38 fixed I'm going to do an initial implementation of > this and compare the performance. If speed says comparable to what we > have now, I'll go ahead and make the switch. > > In the meantime, if anyone has questions or comments about this, as > always, chime in!
I'd say this is all moot until you implement and benchmark it, I mean if this is a single digit (percentage wise) performance hit than go for it, but if it's like 50% slower it might not be a good idea =). I haven't actually bothered to benchmark beanstalkd in my application because I find it is pretty much instantaneous for all intents and purpose (which is one reason I like it). Personally I'd rather see a light weight authentication layer (username/password) and/or TLS support added so it can be exposed to non-trusted networks (for use in Amazon EC2, etc.). > kr -Kurt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
