In a message dated 11/22/2010 5:24:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

why do  you need thousands of tubes? will it not be good to maintain
tubes w.r.t  functionality?

/A

On Nov 19, 4:02 am, "[email protected]"  <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, wonmuhur7  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Can beanstalkd maintain this  many tubes concurrently?
>
> Yes, but there are some O(n)  behaviors with respect to the number of
> tubes. Several thousand is a  fairly small number; it should still be
> reasonably  fast.
>
> If you decide it's not fast enough, be sure to let me  know. There is a
> lot of room for further optimization.
>
>  > Also are tubes deleted automatically if not used for a  while?
>
> A tube is deleted immediately when it is empty and not  referenced.
> Otherwise it will continue to exist.
>
>  kr

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the  Google Groups 
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to  [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email  to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit  this group at  
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to