On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:56 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any plan to support atomically moving a job from one tube to > another?
There isn't, but feel free to open an issue requesting the feature at https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues > Also, it would be more efficient to be able to put directly to a tube > without having to use it first. Not necessarily. If you put many jobs into a single tube, the current way is more efficient. > I'm curious, is there a technical > reason why this isn't currently supported? This is to keep the protocol compatible. Originally, tubes didn't exist. > On a related note, kr, several months ago you mentioned that there is > a lot of room for further optimization re: large numbers of tubes. > FWIW, that could greatly benefit a project I'm working on. Thanks, that's good to know. I've thought a little about it but haven't started work on this yet. > Finally, I wanted to say how much I love Beanstalk. It's very Unix-y. > It does one thing and does it extremely well. Please keep it simple! Thanks! kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
