On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Jon Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm interested in taking a crack at implementing SASL authentication.
Great! Go for it. I'm happy to talk about the design and implementation, and review and pull patches when it comes time. > Is it your preference to have a standalone SASL authenticator rather > than building the functionality directly into Beanstalk? Yes, that is my preference. Note that this requires passing fds over a unix domain socket. > One feature of this approach, I suppose, is that you could handle > multiple users that don't trust one another from a single endpoint by > dispatching to multiple beanstalkd instances. That's true, but I think the main feature is avoiding putting authentication logic in beanstalkd itself (or any other service that uses the standalone authenticator). kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
