Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Beehive Wiki" for 
change notification.

The following page has been changed by SteveTocco:
http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/V1ReleaseCriteria

New page:
'''BEEHIVE 1.0 RELEASE CRITERIA'''

''Author: Steve Tocco  Last Revised Date: 4/6/05, Version 1.8''

This document outlines all of the release criteria to be satisfied before 
Beehive 1.0 can be released.  This document does not address elements to 
specifically get Beehive 1.0 out of Incubation at Apache, but some of these 
milestones may be used in defense of that position.

So here is the proposed list of release criteria for v1 Beehive. In the 
remainder of this document, the Subversion revision number that
(eventually) reflects Beehive 1.0 will be simply referred to as the release 
candidate.  

The release criteria generally fall into one of the following areas:
Source Tree, Distribution Bits, Release Planning, and Documentation.  

'''SOURCE TREE'''
The following indicate activities that must occur in the Beehive Subversion 
Source Tree before we are ready to ship Beehive 1.0.

#1.0 [[BR]]
Objective: All DRTs/Checkin tests pass at 100% when executed against the 
release candidate revision number in the source tree.[[BR]]
Background: All DRTs must pass at 100% for NetUI, JWS and Controls.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes   [[BR]]
Owner(s):   [[BR]]

#1.1[[BR]]
Objective: All BVT/detailed tests pass at 100% when executed against the
release candidate revision number in the source tree.   [[BR]]
Background: Any BVTs/detailed tests not passing should have JIRA issue filed 
and be commented out for the release candidate.  If at a later date a fix is to 
be added to 1.0 (something like 1.0.1) the test can be re-enabled in the 1.0 
branch or in the next major release (1.1 or 2.0) [[BR]]
Gating: Yes   [[BR]]
Owner(s):   [[BR]]

#1.2[[BR]]
Objective: Any tests commented out due to failures should have JIRA issues 
filed (defects or enhancements) to be fixed in subsequent releases. Comments 
within test configuration files should indicate the JIRA issue tracking the 
problem.[[BR]]
Background: N/A [[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#1.3[[BR]]
Objective: The website content must be generated in support of the release 
candidate.[[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#1.4[[BR]]
Objective: The javadoc target for the release candidate must be able to pass 
successfully.
Background: We must be able to successfully build the javadoc.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]


'''DISTRIBUTION BITS'''[[BR]]
The following indicate activities that must occur in support of the Beehive 
Distribution.[[BR]]

#2.0[[BR]]
Objective: The Beehive Distribution must be able to be created from the release 
candidate.[[BR]]
Background: We must be able to build the distribution from the release 
candidate.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.1[[BR]]
Objective: The Beehive Test Distribution must be able to be created from the 
release candidate.[[BR]]
Background: We must be able to build the test distribution from the release 
candidate. This is really needed to verify bits in the distribution.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.2[[BR]]
Objective: All tests (DRTs/checkin/BVTs/detailed) in support of Beehive must be 
able to be executed from the test distribution against the distribution derived 
from the release candidate.[[BR]]
Background: Thus test code must fully be enabled to run in this manner.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.3[[BR]]
Objective: All DRTs/Checkin tests must pass at 100% when executed from the test 
distribution against the distribution for the release candidate for Windows 
2003 Server.[[BR]]
Background: We need the same pass rate to verify it is a good 
distribution.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.4[[BR]]
Objective: All DRTs/Checkin tests must pass at 100% when executed from the test 
distribution against the distribution for the release candidate for Redhat 
Linux AS 3.0.[[BR]]
Background: We need the same pass rate to verify it is a good 
distribution.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.5[[BR]]
Objective: All BVT/Detailed tests must pass at 100% when executed from the test 
distribution against the distribution for the release candidate for Window 2003 
Server.[[BR]]
Background: We need the same pass rate to verify it is a good 
distribution.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.6[[BR]]
Objective: All BVT/Detailed tests must pass at 100% when executed from the test 
distribution against the distribution for the release candidate for Redhat 
Linux AS 3.0.[[BR]]
Background: We need the same pass rate to verify it is a good 
distribution.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.7[[BR]]
Objective: The distribution created from the release candidate must be 
published for download and signed.[[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#2.8[[BR]]
Objective: The JSR 181 Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK) must pass against the 
distribution derived from the release candidate. [[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]


'''RELEASE PLANNING'''[[BR]]
The following indicate activities that must occur in support of the Beehive 
Distribution for Release Planning.[[BR]]

#3.0[[BR]]
Objective: The release candidate needs to be proposed for vote within Apache.  
This needs to be a minimum of three days prior to release and needs to include 
all documentation, tests.[[BR]]
Background: We should not go to vote until all docs are ready including 
samples, user guides, java doc, etc.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#3.1[[BR]]
Objective: The vote submitted for the release candidate must pass.[[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#3.2[[BR]]
Objective: A list of known issues must be produced and published in support of 
the release candidate.  This should capture all known defects (from JIRA) the 
user may encounter.  This need not include enhancements and documentation 
bugs.[[BR]]
Background: Could be published as part of the dist itself or perhaps on the 
Beehive website.  If part of the dist, must be made before the vote.[[BR]]
Gating: No[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#3.3[[BR]]
Objective: For the release candidate, no open bugs will exist.  All items will 
be fixed or assigned to the new release.[[BR]]
Background: Currently all things for the future are assigned to Fix For version 
equal to "TBD".[[BR]]
Gating: No[[BR]]
Owner(s):


'''DOCUMENTATION'''[[BR]]
#4.0[[BR]]
Objective: All samples must be completed for the release candidate. The samples 
list includes: [[BR]]
   1) Petstore [[BR]]
   2) External config feature samples [[BR]]
   3) DB control [[BR]]
   4) Service control [[BR]]
   5) JSF sample[[BR]]
Background: List may grow.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#4.1[[BR]]
Objective: All samples must be part of the distribution for the release 
candidate.  
Background: These need to be proofed and executed.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#4.2[[BR]]
Objective: All Java Doc for "Public Use" APIs must be authored as part of the 
release candidate.
Background: This is mainly a driver to indicate if there is any API that we 
intend users to implement/understand, Javadoc must be provided.[[BR]]
These need to be authored/proofed by developers.[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#4.3[[BR]]
Objective: All tutorials on the website must be able to be successfully 
executed against the distribution created from the release candidate.[[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes [[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

#4.4[[BR]]
Objective: The Beehive website must be updated to support the release 
candidate, including samples, download information, etc.[[BR]]
Background: N/A[[BR]]
Gating: Yes[[BR]]
Owner(s):[[BR]]

Reply via email to