Thanks for your information. I've used SVN locally with TortoiseSVN (http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/) for some authoring work and found it more powerful and simpler to use than CVS.
Ias P.S. Subeclipse 0.9.3.1, the latest distribution doesn't go with Eclipse 3.0 Final, so you need to fix it from Subeclipse update site, http://www.loonsoft.com/updates/ . > Since it looks like we will be using Subversion for Beehive, > I thought this post from the incubator list might be useful. > > Cliff > > Ted Husted wrote on Monday, July 05, 2004 4:17 AM: > > > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:16:59 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote: > >> Oh, it will be CVS for now, I believe, as our most-beloved > >> programming tools don't have subversion support integrated > until now. > > > > Which tools would those be? There are SVN plugins for both IDEA > > (http://svnup.tigris.org) and Eclipse > (http://subclipse.tigris.org) . > > For shells, TortoiseSVN is also quite good, if you are > using Windows, > > and there is RapidSVN if not (see tigris.org). Meanwhile, cvs2svn > > (http://cvs2svn.tigris.org) will transfer your CVS history > to SVN. > > > > A bonus is that since SVN supports directory renaming, I > believe more > > history will be retained under SVN than you would retain under CVS. > > > > Subversion is designed as a improved CVS, and, IMHO, lives > up to its > > design goals. The learning curve is surprisingly minimal. > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
