> The general practice on JSRs is to do a "clean room" > implementation of the javax.* classes, taking special care to > not introduce any additional public or protected variables or > methods, or alter any of the method signatures (doing any of > this would cause a failure of the signature tests in the TCK > later on). That's what Tomcat did for the servlet and JSP > api calsses (in the CVS modules jakarta-servletapi-4 and > jakarta-servletapi-5), and what Geronimo did in one of their > modules as well.
Thanks for your guidance. What I'm thinking is that JSR-181 APIs contains only public annotation types, so there's no problem to publish them as they are on Beehive SNV. I'll take care of making a "clean room" implementation of javax.* packages for JSR-181 in case we can't use those from JSR-181 ED (Probably we can figure it within a week). In the mean time, we need to decide directory structure for WSM. I'll post a suggestion for that on wiki soon. Regards, Ias > > Craig >
