+1
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:54:36 -0600, Richard Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on the branch. Same issue -- I'll want to start working on > (potentially destabilizing) features before ApacheCon. > Rich > > > > Kyle Marvin wrote: > > >+1 to doing a branch, and I'd vote for early next week. > > > >I'm working some proposals for a Controls roadmap and other planning-related > >activities this week, but want to get cranking on code again next week. > >Some of them will be biggish that are probably out of scope or destabilizing > >and don't belong in the (to-be-stabilized) track for ApacheCon. > > > >-- Kyle > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Heather Stephens > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:55 PM > >>To: Beehive Developers > >>Subject: [Proposal] Branch for ApacheCon release? > >> > >> > >>Should we branch for our ApacheCon release? > >>Obviously this would allow feature work to go on in the mainline while > >>we wrap up the demo polish details in the branch for ApacheCon. > >> > >>If we do want to branch does anybody want to propose a day for it? > >>Perhaps early next week sometime? > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
