Sounds right on.  I can't +1 because I never was that good I math.
mbg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Tam 
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:13 AM
> To: Beehive Developers
> Subject: RE: Changes to docs, now that we have a distribution.
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Agree that the general approach of just injecting most/all of 
> the website HTML into the distro, while suboptimal, is 
> probably workable for ApacheCon.  In some ways though, it 
> just pushes the question down a
> level: how should the docs should be organized on the website?
> 
> One of the main concerns I have with the website docs right 
> now is that because we've only recently had a distribution, 
> we've not been describing things from the 2 perspectives we 
> should: that of the Beehive contributor (someone who works on 
> the Beehive project itself), and that of the Beehive user 
> (someone who downloads Beehive and builds apps with it).  
> Everything right now is from the perspective of the 
> contributor, and I think that needs to be fixed for ApacheCon.
> 
> Currently the nav tree on the website has a single "Documentation"
> heading.  How about separating that into "Contributor 
> Documentation" and "User Documentation" (it might make sense 
> to move "Contributor Documentation" under "Community", but 
> that's probably worth its own thread)?.  Stuff like "Building 
> Beehive" should go under "Contributor Documentation", whereas 
> everything under "User Documentation" should be written in 
> terms of a user w/ an installed distribution (as opposed to a 
> developer with a Beehive svn tree).
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Hanson
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:44 PM
> > To: Beehive Developers
> > Subject: Changes to docs, now that we have a distribution.
> > 
> > Hi all:
> > 
> > Now that we have a distribution, we need some way to get 
> docs into it.
> > 
> > The easiest way to do this before ApacheCon, is to inject 
> the HTML web 
> > site (trunk\site\build\site\index.html) into the dist.  Any 
> > objections, concerns about this?  Or better ideas?
> > 
> > -Steve Hanson
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to