+1
Alpha -- yes. An early one at that. <g>
Richard Feit wrote:
+1
Heather Stephens wrote:
I think we should call it alpha. Calling it "ApacheCon 2004" doesn't really give any indication to our users about our expectations of the distribution.
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Tam Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:36 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Result] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
Heather, can you create an "ApacheCon 2004" version in JIRA and bulk-edit the issues that are currently set to "TBD"? Owners can then assign out to Version 1 as appropriate.
Thanks!
-----Original Message----- From: Heather Stephens Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:51 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: [Result] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
Let's go for it...
*11 of 24 committers voted. (~50% are actively contributing to the current code base)
*11 of 11 voted +1.
*3 people in the community responded with +1 love.
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Hanson Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:56 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
Sorry for the late response... +1
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Tocco Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:58 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
+1
-----Original Message----- From: Heather Stephens Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:14 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
5 of 24 committers voted. 5 of 5 voted +1. Of those 24 committers, around 50% are actively participating.
Rotan, Ias, Michael, Steve H., Daryl, Steve, James, Eddie -- what do you say to driving towards a release at ApacheCon?
If a simple majority of active committers wants to do this, I think we should go for it.
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Feit Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:21 AM To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
+1
I think we need to have a release before ApacheCon in order to get the framework out to people who want to try it... unless it's impossible to drive to a stable one in that timeframe (and I definitely don't think it
is).
Kyle Marvin wrote:
+1 on doing a release for ApacheCon
-----Original Message----- From: Heather Stephens Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 12:51 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
We've gotten response from Cliff and Ken. IMO that isn't enough to push
us to a release for ApacheCon. Does anybody else have an opinion or
should we kill this proposal now?
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Tam Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:21 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
-----Original Message----- From: Heather Stephens Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:45 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: [Proposal] Pre-V1 release for ApacheCon?
Question 1 --> Should we shoot to do a pre-V1 release of Beehive for ApacheCon? (NOTE: We would also need Incubator PMC approval for this of course.)
+1, I think the timing is ideal for a release.
Question 3 --> Proposal on Goals/Non-goals ============== Goals ============== *Practice the release process so we can begin to work out the kinks *Binary distribution available *"Demoable" for ApacheCon sessions *Enough supporting materials (sample applications, feature samples, documentation, tutorials, etc.) to generate interest in Beehive, begin to build a more active user community and get useful on the current feature set.
==============
Non-goals
==============
*Feature complete
*APIs locked
*Beta-quality
*Guarantee of backwards compat
+1, we're overdue to start driving on these goals.
