My changes are in both v1/alpha and trunk now. I was under the impression (someone correct me if I'm wrong), that we weren't going to roll a source distribution.
At some point soon, we're going to have to cut-off v1/alpha checkins in order to actually publish a release for ApacheCon. Heather, any idea what this date is? So, we might either hurry or not worry about v1/alpha.
<g>
Eddie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, svn-snapshot was better than nothing -- using datetimestamp would be even better. Just didn't have a place to hang that that everyone would use when creating their distro JARs. Should have that now. <g>
I'll add that logic to the build-common then.
btw, for the ApacheCon dist, v1/alpha/ is the branch I should be on?
Good question. <g> I've done all of my work in trunk/ and not worried about having that ready for ApacheCon. If others have opinions here (Ken?), speak now and I can likely roll my trunk/ changes back into v1/alpha.
If we're doing a milestone distribution drop for apachecon, I think the build changes will help contribute to a nice tidy release, so if you could, push at least your build.xml changes on into the branch for me. I, too, have been working on the trunk/ only because I wasn't sure which was which. The peanut/ removal occurred on trunk/, which, if peanut can really go away, applying that nukage to v1/alpha/ would be great also.
thanks, guys,
-bob
