+1 I would be in favor is isolating jars not only by name but also directory structure.
-----Original Message----- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:31 PM To: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: adding "beehive" to the JAR names Yeah, agreed about the urgency of doing it soon. :) Kyle Marvin wrote: > This feels right to me... it should be possible to look at a > Beehive-based app and identify the jars that are actually related to > the Beehive runtime (vs those for struts, axis, other functions, etc). > > If we are going to do this, it seems like it needs to be soon. > > -- Kyle > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:02:32 -0700, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>All-- >> >> I'd like to suggest that we add "beehive" as a prefix to the names of >>all of the JARs that we produce. Today, this would affect controls and >>WSM directly -- NetUI is already doing this at least for JARs shipped in >>the distribution. >> >> Any thoughts on this? >> >>Eddie >> > >
