[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-699?page=comments#action_64958 ] Jeremiah Johnson commented on BEEHIVE-699: ------------------------------------------
bash05102005 > wsm-employee problems > --------------------- > > Key: BEEHIVE-699 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-699 > Project: Beehive > Type: Bug > Components: Samples > Versions: V1 > Environment: Beehive Dist 20050510 > Reporter: Jeremiah Johnson > Fix For: V1 > > A decision will be made with BEEHIVE-661 whether wsm-employee should be part > of the distribution or not. It wsm-employee does become part of the > distribution, then it needs to be changed. This bug is to make sure that > changes to wsm-employee happen without it getting into the dist just because > it compiles. > wsm-employee won't compile as it is - not on Unix, anyway. Just to get it to > compile, wsm-employee/WEB-INF/build.xml needs the following changes: > web.inf.dir needs to be WEB-INF rather than web-inf; the taskdef for apt > needs to use classpath ${beehive.home}/lib/controls/beehive-controls.jar > rather than lib/beehive-controls.jar; classpathref needs to be lib.path > rather than jars; and the line with derby_46005.jar needs to be removed. > The EmployeeDBControl.jcx uses the controls-db control, but I think that > should be changed over to use the jdbc-control rather than the sample. The > two reasons for that are 1) jdbc-control could benefit from sample customers > and 2) the controls-db only supports jndiName. Pervious discussions about > using JNDI in the samples has resulted in the preference of using the driver > rather than JNDI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
