I have updated the wsm-addressbook-enahced. My suggestion is to remove wsm-sample as a sample. I think after V1 it would be better to clean up the wsm-samples and package them as unit testing rather than sample. It would give the WSM coverage for annotations, and also the test cases can be used as by developers as examples also.
Daryoush > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie ONeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:10 AM > To: Beehive Developers > Subject: packaging of beehive samples > > All-- > > Currently, we've got a good set of samples showing Beehive features > and integration with Spring, JSF, etc. > > However, these samples are somewhat inconsistently packaged -- would > be great if we could get all of the source files in > WEB-INF/src*/*.java repackaged into an: > > org.apache.beehive.samples.[wsm|netui|controls|<custom>] > > package namespace. This has been done for: > > controls-spring > petstoreWeb > > but needs to happen for: > > wsm-samples > wsm-addressbook-enhanced > netui-samples (just for SharedFlow.java) > netui-jsf > > Not sure that we need to do these for the *-blank samples as they're > meant more as starters rather than samples, so it seems like we could > leave these as-is. > > Thoughts? > > Eddie
