Totally. That's a great template for us. Should we just add this stuff
to the "known issues" (#3.2) of our release criteria
(http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/V1ReleaseCriteria )?
Eddie ONeil wrote:
Yeah, definitely agree with that. Something like this:
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.0.2.1.html
On 6/7/05, Daryl Olander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I would add, is a release description. This would describe
the overall goals of the release (feature work, bug fix work, etc).
In addition, it would be nice if each release had a bit of a road map
for the expectations and time frame is for the next release in the
line. In addition, if the release is a branch from some release, the
relationship of the release with the branches should be described.
On 6/7/05, Eddie ONeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems that it should contain all of these. At the very least, bugs
/ issues addressed in the release and known issues should go into some
sort of release note (IMHO). Not sure how new features should be
described -- I'd be fine with those being addressed in the same
location under some sort of a different section.
Eddie
On 6/7/05, Richard Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Q: Now that our first (milestone) release is out, what should future
Release Notes contain?
- high-level description of new features
- bugs/issues addressed in the release
- known issues
?
