Steve-- Looks good; thanks for adding those. I tweaked the wiki page a bit to remove one criterion about the distribution being published and signed -- that's just part of it all. :)
Anyone else have something they'd like to see happen before the Beehive 1.0 release? Eddie On 8/18/05, Steven Tocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eddie, > > Thanks for kicking this off. > > In support of the v1 release, I've put together some release criteria > and posted them to the wiki. > > http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/V1ReleaseCriteria > > These are similar to those we used for v1m1, but with a few minor edits. > > Please let me know if you have any problems with these. > > Thanks > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie ONeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:58 AM > To: Beehive Developers > Subject: beehive 1.0 release status > > All-- > > Just to update where it seems that we are relative to shipping a > Beehive 1.0 release. > > - there are four open JIRA bugs, one of which is blocking: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-872 > - there is one JIRA issue that we should probably fix: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-881 > because this one changes one of the NetUI annotation processor options > - personally, I'd like to finish some documentation on the Ant build > macros, the project model, and the NetUI data grid. Any others have > documentation things to finish before voting on 1.0? > > One note on BEEHIVE-872, this is a licensing issue with the JSR 173 > API JAR that was brought up in the XMLBeans dev@ list. Apparently, > there are concerns about the license of this JAR file which XMLBeans > requires and ships -- link to the thread here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlbeans-dev/200507.mbox/%3c534 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Beehive bundles this JAR as well. In the interest of preventing > license issues, we should probably wait and see the conclusion of this > discussion before shipping 1.0 with jsr173_1.0_api.jar bundled. If I > see a change in status on the dev@xmlbeans.apache.org list, I'll > update that here. > > Other than the couple of bugs, doc tasks, and JSR 173 issues, I > think we're pretty close. if it takes too much longer, we can just > cut a 1.0 branch and open trunk/ back up for continuing development > work. > > Comments welcome... > > Eddie > >
