Hum, seems I've been working on that many months ago ... but I have
absolutely no memory of it ! (getting old is ugly !).

I'll have a look.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Adrian Sampson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That’s not currently possible, alas—the `original_date` option overwrites
> the actual release date.
>
> That might be a good use case for this old feature proposal:
> https://github.com/beetbox/beets/issues/488
>
>
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Michael MacLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to keep both release_year and original_year, but make $year
> default to one or the other? Ie, I want the tags and paths to use
> original_year, because that's how I generally think about my music, but I
> want to keep release_year info in the DB in case I want to query for it.
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Sampson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Beets also records the “original” release date for each release group
>> (original_year, etc.). If you’d like to use this for the main date tag, you
>> can also do that:
>> http://beets.readthedocs.io/en/v1.4.2/reference/config.html?
>> #original-date
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> > On Jan 5, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Pierre Rust <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > lately I've been doing some retagging / cleanup on old albums and I
>> just realized that many of them where getting tagged with very recent dates.
>> > For example, when tagging "Let It Bleed" from The Stones (initially
>> released in 1968), it get a date in 2002 !
>> > When looking at the musicbrainz release (automatically) selected during
>> import, it make some sense : http://musicbrainz.org/release
>> /b2ca3b22-f3cc-40c0-b2d3-f4e1d6602106
>> > 2002 is the date for this specific release, so it's not completely
>> wrong, yet it's definitively not what I'm looking for nor the info I want
>> to be displayed in my library.
>> >
>> > I've experimented reimporting with the timid option and selecting
>> manually the id of the original release on imdb : it works but is quite
>> tedious (the orginial release is not even in the list of the proposed
>> candidates) and it requires to first identify all mis-dated albums (as
>> there where imported automatically with -q, I did not realize immediately
>> that the previously correct date were being overwritten ...)
>> >
>> > I don't remember seeing this behavior before (and I've been using beets
>> for some years now), is that something new, voluntary or bug  ? Is there
>> any way to get the date for the original release instead ?
>> >
>> > thanks !
>> >
>> > Pierre
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "beets" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "beets" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "beets" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "beets" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"beets" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to