Send Beginners mailing list submissions to
beginners@haskell.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
beginners-requ...@haskell.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
beginners-ow...@haskell.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Beginners digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Export of names only for testing (Baa)
2. Re: Export of names only for testing (David McBride)
3. Re: Export of names only for testing (Baa)
4. Re: Export of names only for testing (David McBride)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:28:18 +0300
From: Baa <aqua...@gmail.com>
To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily
beginner-level topics related to Haskell <beginners@haskell.org>
Subject: [Haskell-beginners] Export of names only for testing
Message-ID: <20171002122818.50bd85d0@Pavel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hello, All!
What is the standard Haskell convenience about export of module names for
testing? As I understand, I should export all of them which looks like
abstraction leak, but without this I can't test them, right?
===
Best regards, Paul
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:39:31 -0400
From: David McBride <toa...@gmail.com>
To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily
beginner-level topics related to Haskell <beginners@haskell.org>
Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Export of names only for testing
Message-ID:
<CAN+Tr40L=vgfi+oso-8jerajsrnzgrr6jei5gzij6uvdzgo...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
It is common to export an Foo.Internal module that has the internals of
your library in it, with a doc at the top that this is meant for internal
use. It can be used both for testing and sometimes the user of your
library can do something with it you didn't think of if he has access to
the internals.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Baa <aqua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, All!
>
> What is the standard Haskell convenience about export of module names for
> testing? As I understand, I should export all of them which looks like
> abstraction leak, but without this I can't test them, right?
>
> ===
> Best regards, Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20171002/eb87adae/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 13:49:07 +0300
From: Baa <aqua...@gmail.com>
To: beginners@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Export of names only for testing
Message-ID: <20171002134907.130b5d75@Pavel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> It is common to export an Foo.Internal module that has the internals
> of your library in it, with a doc at the top that this is meant for
> internal use. It can be used both for testing and sometimes the user
> of your library can do something with it you didn't think of if he
> has access to the internals.
Hm, but if I have 10 modules in src/ (m1.hs, ..., m10.hs) I must create,
for example 10 folders like src/m1/, ..., src/m10/ and their individual
M*.Internal module, right? So, `m1`, for example, becomes:
src/
m1/
Internal.hs
All.hs
?
And `All.hs` imports and re-exports module (or its part only)
`Internal.hs`? Something like this?
===
Best regards, Paul
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 07:12:40 -0400
From: David McBride <toa...@gmail.com>
To: The Haskell-Beginners Mailing List - Discussion of primarily
beginner-level topics related to Haskell <beginners@haskell.org>
Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] Export of names only for testing
Message-ID:
<can+tr43desg-k5s2k4xekfb4wjpyfeadhqopgc8dadhyoia...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All I can give are examples. These have single Internal modules.
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/text-1.2.2.2/docs/Data-Text-Internal.html
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/aeson-1.2.2.0/docs/Data-Aeson-Internal.html
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-4.3.5/docs/Pipes-Internal.html
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex-0.4.0/docs/Reflex-Spider-Internal.html
whereas opaleye for example has an entire Internal hierarchy.
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/opaleye-0.6.0.0
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Baa <aqua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is common to export an Foo.Internal module that has the internals
> > of your library in it, with a doc at the top that this is meant for
> > internal use. It can be used both for testing and sometimes the user
> > of your library can do something with it you didn't think of if he
> > has access to the internals.
>
> Hm, but if I have 10 modules in src/ (m1.hs, ..., m10.hs) I must create,
> for example 10 folders like src/m1/, ..., src/m10/ and their individual
> M*.Internal module, right? So, `m1`, for example, becomes:
>
> src/
> m1/
> Internal.hs
> All.hs
> ?
>
> And `All.hs` imports and re-exports module (or its part only)
> `Internal.hs`? Something like this?
>
>
> ===
> Best regards, Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20171002/069f3a8a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners
------------------------------
End of Beginners Digest, Vol 112, Issue 2
*****************************************
