Send Beginners mailing list submissions to beginners@haskell.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to beginners-requ...@haskell.org
You can reach the person managing the list at beginners-ow...@haskell.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Beginners digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: What's wrong with Haddock?! (Francesco Ariis) 2. Re: What's wrong with Haddock?! (Baa) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:32:10 +0200 From: Francesco Ariis <fa...@ariis.it> To: beginners@haskell.org Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] What's wrong with Haddock?! Message-ID: <20171026123210.dgj3ctgoygxi7...@x60s.casa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:58:43PM +0300, Baa wrote: > @Francesco: > > I tried it (added extension InstanceSigs, added "^.."-style docstring), > nothing changed. So, may be docstrings in instances are impossible at > whole? May be it makes sense... May be they should be documented in its > classes instead? Mhhh indeed you are correct, I tried to replicate and while haddock doesn't complain, it doesn't output anything for the implemented functions. Maybe a workaround could be: -- | Prova instance Fun Foo where fun :: a fun = undefined This will put text on the right of the /instance declaration/. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:02:44 +0300 From: Baa <aqua...@gmail.com> To: beginners@haskell.org Subject: Re: [Haskell-beginners] What's wrong with Haddock?! Message-ID: <20171026160244.2e84e551@Pavel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII @Francesco: yes, it is. OK, it's a workaround :) Thank you! > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:58:43PM +0300, Baa wrote: > > @Francesco: > > > > I tried it (added extension InstanceSigs, added "^.."-style > > docstring), nothing changed. So, may be docstrings in instances are > > impossible at whole? May be it makes sense... May be they should be > > documented in its classes instead? > > Mhhh indeed you are correct, I tried to replicate and while haddock > doesn't complain, it doesn't output anything for the implemented > functions. > > Maybe a workaround could be: > > -- | Prova > instance Fun Foo where > fun :: a > fun = undefined > > This will put text on the right of the /instance declaration/. > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners ------------------------------ End of Beginners Digest, Vol 112, Issue 25 ******************************************