Perhaps because it's intended audience or purpose has little to do with what "real" programmers are interested in? Which would be a shame because it seems pretty clear that whatever those interests are they haven't done a great deal to advance the practice very much.

---Rick

PS: "real" is in quotes up there. No troll intended.

On Aug 8, 2006, at 2:17 AM, 啸然 wrote:

My opinion is, the power of Smalltalk is same as an OS, but Smalltalk is as a programming language. The Smalltalk should be an OS.
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

Reply via email to