On Thursday 04 January 2007 05:51, Aleksandr Skobelev wrote: > Stephen Austin <antirealist at gmail.com> wrote: > > What version of Squeak are you using? I found the DejaVu fonts made > > the GUI unusably slow using 3.8 - I haven't tried them in 3.9, and > > I don't know if this problem has been resolved. But out of the box > > both 3.8 and 3.9 are very fast, and I get nowhere near 100% CPU > > load. > > > > (Another) Steve > > Steven Elkins <sgelkins at gmail.com> wroter: > > On 1/3/07, Aleksandr Skobelev <al_skobelev at mail.ru> wrote: > > > GUI responsiveness is too low and the such basic operations as > > > changing a window size or moving it (with > > > fastDragWindowForMorphic disaibled) load CPU upto 100%. And after > > > I've installed DejaVu > > > > fonts, > > > > > I need to wait upto 4 seconds everytime I change size of the > > > SqueakMap Package Loader window. Switching from the Class > > > libraries category to Development tools takes about 8 seconds. > > > > So...how does a vanilla image perform? And which image version are > > you using? I have fastDrag enabled (disabling is too slow for me > > too) and I haven't installed those fonts. > > > > Steve > > I'm using 3.9-final-7067 image. Without DejaVu fonts GUI works much > better, but it still seems to be very heavy for my machine (for > example, scrolling of the "Changes that have been done in 3.9" window > gives 100% CPU load).
The Squeak mouse logo - with the eyes which follow the cursor - takes quite a bit of CPU resource. Making it smaller with the yellow halo handle, or indeed removing it completely will reduce the CPU load considerably. -- CS _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
