From: Marcus Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "A friendly place to get answers to even the most basic questionsabout Squeak." <beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org> To: "A friendly place to get answers to even the most basic questions aboutSqueak." <beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Newbies] Help! Where's Wonderland in Squeak 3.9 ?
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:10:41 +0100


On 18.01.2007, at 09:38, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

El 1/17/07 7:56 PM, "Henry Lenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:


I success in doing so for MorphicWrappers and MathMorphs, what last  time
what run complete was in the 2.1 - 2.3 middle age of Squeak.

Also I plan a FunSqueak version, with all games , Steph tutorial,  etc. ,
scheduled at end of May.

What do not means what Wonderland could be developed now, only what IF IT'S
POSSIBLE have running into 3.10, many people like you are happy.

And maybe your kids was enough motivate for what in a few years THEY do the
next 3D killer Squeak.

Disagree Marcus ?


Yes, completely disagree. But if you want to dust of other peoples failed experiments,
all power to you.

I agree with Marcus.

My suggestion is that if you plan to put projects without maintainers out there, it must be clear to the newbies that these are not actively supported or maintained, and that it was just a demo or something to that effect.

Otherwise the newbies may be misled that there is a maintainer and will get frustrated in wondering why the failed pieces are not well-supported or why their questions went unanswered. As a result, they may be frustrated and end up leaving Squeak during the learning process.

-Larry Trutter

_________________________________________________________________
Get Hilary Duff’s homepage with her photos, music, and more. http://www.live.com/?addtemplate=hilary&ocid=T001MSN30A0701

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

Reply via email to