Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > To get syntax highlighting etc. you should try the 4.1 release candidate, > which has a lot of fixes over 4.0: > I did, and was able to install ocompletion with no problem. Although I realized that there seems to me something missing fundamentally in the way packages are represented. Most of the time, when I go to a repository, I find several packages with seemingly no cohesive information about what they do e.g. for OCompletion there are ECompletion, Ocompletion, OCompletionTests (okay this one is obvious), ExperimentalOcompletion, OCForOB, OCLoader, and Ocompletion-Tests (okay maybe not so obvious - to dash or not to dash...). Now I'm not singling out OCompletion - this seems to be the standard model. My slant is to install the minimum necessary, but am I missing a general practice to install all packages available? Although in the OCompletion example, it does not seem to be the right choice, because ECompletion and OCLoader seem to be either-or.
Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > In general, external packages are in a sorrow state. Only a few are > actively maintained. Scamper is not, as you discovered. > > Providing a collection of "good" packages with a release is one of the > goals of 4.2. > Thank you for doing that. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Installing-packages-not-tp1753783p1754504.html Sent from the Squeak - Beginners mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
