Basically with monticello you can set up a unique repository and then commit there the baseline and changes from both images. Once there you can merge differences easily.
Cheers, Mariano. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Clinton Blackmore < clinton.blackm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have heard of Monticello. (I may need to re-read the chapter on it in > Squeak By Example). I've used other version control systems, and understand > how to use them, but I don't know of any that let you diff source trees that > aren't in the same version control system, so I have no reason to expect > that Monticello would do that, either. > > Still, I suppose I could try to leverage off of the diffing tools and > change the way that it gets its input data. My biggest hang-up is that I > am, well, a beginner with Squeak. > > Thank you, > Clinton > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Mariano Abel Coca < > marianoabelc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry for the noise, I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but >> just because it hasn't been mentioned in this thread I have to suggest it: >> have you looked at Monticello and Metacello? >> >> Monticello is the similar to a cvs repository merged with aptitude. And it >> has it's own diffing tools to compare and merge sources. >> >> And Metacello defines dependencies between packages and it's versions. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mariano. >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Clinton Blackmore < >> clinton.blackm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I can install a library and start communicating over sockets with one >>> line of code?! That's incredible. >>> >>> [Incidentally, as a system administrator, I did ask about diffing two >>> filesystems: >>> http://serverfault.com/questions/10424/diffing-two-filesystems . >>> (grin)] >>> >>> Clinton >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:59 AM, David Mitchell < >>> david.mitch...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> People have certainly built tools that do image archeology but they >>>> have tended to be more academic than practical. >>>> >>>> Outside of Squeak, imagine writing a tool to look at two WMware VMDK >>>> files onto which two different people had installed Windows, Firefox, >>>> and various other tools. It might be theoretically possible to write a >>>> program that would look at two VMDKs and tell you about the different >>>> versions of programs that are installed, but it is practically very >>>> difficult. It would be much easier to start both machines on the >>>> network and have them inventory their programs and then compare. >>>> >>>> If you are interested in having two (running) Squeaks talk to one >>>> another, you might want to look at Magma. Magma can store just about >>>> any Squeak object in an object database that multiple Squeaks can >>>> connect. >>>> >>>> Magma's remote framework can be used outside of Magma. It is available >>>> as "Ma client server" See this page for details and usage: >>>> >>>> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2978 >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Clinton Blackmore >>>> <clinton.blackm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Yes, I suppose an image is a virtual machine suspended in time. I >>>> hadn't >>>> > even considered comparing things other than the source code. >>>> > I'd wondered about filing everything out. That sounds like the way to >>>> go. >>>> > Having the two images talk to each other and run comparisons also >>>> sounds >>>> > very interesting -- but sounds rather difficult (although, perhaps it >>>> is not >>>> > and it is just my lack of understanding of squeak that makes it seem >>>> so). >>>> > Clinton >>>> > >>>> > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Mateusz Grotek < >>>> unodue...@poczta.onet.pl> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> If you want to compare source code only, you can file it out. You >>>> could >>>> >> also write some code in both images, and ask them to do comparisons >>>> (use >>>> >> sockets of fifos, or similar mechanisms for IPC). >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Beginners mailing list >>>> >> Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Beginners mailing list >>>> > Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Beginners mailing list >>>> Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Beginners mailing list >>> Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Beginners mailing list >> Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners > >
_______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
