Hi Beginners and Scott,

I think I qualify as an "oldie" (in as when I learned to program - 1968,
Autocoder) and a "newie" (in as when I became aware Perl might be a fun
language to learn - 2000).  In between I have been doing not a lot of
programming per se.  But in the last couple of years exposure to *NIX and
then *sh, sed and awk have sparked my thirst for some "recreational
programming".  Note that I have had NO C experience, and just some early
(Apple) Pascal.

All this is in support of my practical experience of the books I bought.  

First The Camel.  Went to read it and thought "Whoa, I've  been away too
long!"

Then (hang the expense) The Complete Reference Perl (Brown; pub
Osborne/McGraw Hill) - found it difficult, and I think it's got a number of
typos in critical places.  I'll go back, maybe, when I really do need to
know about threads 8-)

Then (I really needed to get something working, at work!!) to Perl for
Dummies.  I found it an acceptable start (how's this - I bought it because
the shop didn't have The Llama, and I had a free weekend 8-(  but again,
some typos and examples I found difficult to "get the point".

Then I finally succumbed and got The Llama out of my employer's library.  

If you know lots about programming (and I mean "modern" languages such as C,
C++, Java and the like) then I think you could skip The Llama, but otherwise
I think it (The Llama) gets you into the right frame of mind for Perl.  It
made a big difference for me.

Now The Camel is making lots of sense.

Murray Webster
Database Administrator
EDS Australia.

PS:  I've got Perl in a Nutshell - which is my first point of call for
"Reference".

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 16 June 2001 2:01
To: Perl Beginners (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Reading versus Referencing Books


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: RE: Reading versus Referencing Books
>
> I think it depends on how much experience you have with
> programming and the
> concepts of it as a whole.
>

        True.  I suppose I was making the assumption that everyone in the
audience
had such experience to begin with.  If I'm not mistaken, "Programming Perl"
makes that assumption as well, which would certainly *not* make it a good
reference for learning programming in general.

++========================================================================++
|| UNIREZ, Inc.                                            Scott Thompson ||
++-------------------------------------------+----------------------------++
|| Address: 2555 Southwest Grapevine Parkway | Title:     Programmer      ||
||          Suite 200                        | Phone:     (817) 416-5800  ||
||          Grapevine, Texas 76051           | Extension: 104             ||
|| Fax:     (817) 251-9199                   | Cell:      (972) 342-5660  ||
|| Web:     http://www.unirez.com/           | Email:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]||
++===========================================+============================++

Reply via email to