On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, iansmith wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Paul wrote:
> > $count = () = /$pattern/g;
>
> This seems like a place that an array() operator like scalar()
> woudl be usefull. Then you could do '$count = array(/$pat/g);'
> instead. I know the above works well, but it would be nice for
> completeness to have array() as well as scalar().
However, remember that () is not creating an array, it's creating a list
context, and then it gets forced into a scalar context.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Culture is the habit of being pleased with the best and knowing why.
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a regex? Wagner-David
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a rege... Paul
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a ... iansmith
- RE: How do I determine number of matches i... Brett W. McCoy
- RE: How do I determine number of match... iansmith
- RE: How do I determine number of ... Brett W. McCoy
- Re: How do I determine number... Michael Fowler
- RE: How do I determine nu... Paul Burkett
- Re: How do I determine number of match... Michael Fowler
- Re: How do I determine number of matches i... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: How do I determine number of match... iansmith
- Re: How do I determine number of ... Brett W. McCoy
- Re: How do I determine number... iansmith
- Re: How do I determine nu... Randal L. Schwartz
