On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, iansmith wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Paul wrote: > > $count = () = /$pattern/g; > > This seems like a place that an array() operator like scalar() > woudl be usefull. Then you could do '$count = array(/$pat/g);' > instead. I know the above works well, but it would be nice for > completeness to have array() as well as scalar(). However, remember that () is not creating an array, it's creating a list context, and then it gets forced into a scalar context. -- Brett http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Culture is the habit of being pleased with the best and knowing why.
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a regex? Wagner-David
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a rege... Paul
- RE: How do I determine number of matches in a ... iansmith
- RE: How do I determine number of matches i... Brett W. McCoy
- RE: How do I determine number of match... iansmith
- RE: How do I determine number of ... Brett W. McCoy
- Re: How do I determine number... Michael Fowler
- RE: How do I determine nu... Paul Burkett
- Re: How do I determine number of match... Michael Fowler
- Re: How do I determine number of matches i... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: How do I determine number of match... iansmith
- Re: How do I determine number of ... Brett W. McCoy
- Re: How do I determine number... iansmith
- Re: How do I determine nu... Randal L. Schwartz