Ray,

it's not Mason; it's strictly homegrown code.

seems to be some requirement for html <head> via a module call that's
not necessary in straight perl inline html.  thanks for the
suggestion, though.  i appreciate your suggestion.

joe


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Raymond Wan <r....@aist.go.jp> wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
>
> jm wrote:
>>
>> why do the <head> tags in the sub work and the page display perfectly
>> with the additional empty <head> tags, yet only print out the code as
>> ascii output when i remove the 2nd set of <head> tags?  why are the
>> <head> tags in the sub not considered legitimate html code when the
>> <head> structures are identical in both the sub and the main code?
>
>
> I think you will have better luck taking your questions to the Mason mailing
> list, as that seems to be what you are using.  They should be more helpful.
>  Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to your questions -- sorry.
>
> Mason MLs:  http://www.masonhq.com/?MailingLists
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
since this is a gmail account, please verify the mailing list is
included in the reply to addresses

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/


Reply via email to