>>>>> "JG" == Jenn G <practicalp...@gmail.com> writes:
JG> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Uri Guttman<u...@stemsystems.com> wrote: >>>>>>> "JG" == Jenn G <practicalp...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> JG> When I create a package, and call its methods by both object way and >> JG> function (exported) way, how to avoid the conflict in arguments >> JG> passing? >> >> why are you trying to do OO and procedural calls on the same subs? it >> makes no sense. how will a procedural find the 'object' the method style >> is going to use for its data? there is a technique for using procedural >> calls with a singleton object but that requires you assume only one >> object of that type ever. i don't think you seem to want that. >> JG> Really? Hmm, see these below: JG> # perl -e 'use CGI qw/header/; print header()' JG> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 JG> # perl -e 'use CGI; my $q=CGI->new; print $q->header' JG> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 that is doing the exact thing i mentioned, using a singleton object with the procedural interface. this is NOT what you asked about. you seemed to want a general way to do this which can't be done. very few OO libs work with singletons as you generally want to create as many object as you want. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ u...@stemsystems.com -------- http://www.sysarch.com -- ----- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support ------ --------- Free Perl Training --- http://perlhunter.com/college.html --------- --------- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix ---- http://bestfriendscocoa.com --------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org http://learn.perl.org/
