On Sunday 31 Oct 2010, Shlomi Fish wrote: [ snipped ] > > &testsub1(); > > Don't use leading ampersands in subroutine calls:
Suppose a subroutine definition is written down the line and it's called without (), which is the recommended style: &SubRoutine or SubRoutine I remember I'd read in the past that & should be used in such cases so that Perl can easily recognize I'm attempting to call a subroutine, correct and/or is that (only) required with older versions? -- Regards, Akhthar Parvez K http://www.sysadminguide.com/ UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity - Dennis Ritchie -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org http://learn.perl.org/
