>>>>> "SF" == Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> writes:
SF> Well, some use cases for goto in C:
SF> 1. Breaking out of more outer loop (as there is no "continue label;" or
"break
SF> label;" in C:
SF> <CODE>
SF> for (i=0 ; i < len ; i++)
SF> {
SF> for (j = 0....
SF> {
SF> if (func(i, j)
SF> {
SF> goto after_loops;
SF> }
SF> }
SF> }
wrap the loops in a sub and return. no goto needed.
SF> 2. Another is the de-allocation of resources at the end of the
SF> function with checking for failure:
i gave a solution to this in another post. goto is not needed. this is a
crutch for poor coders. you design to not need such constructs. if you
SF> I should note that in C "continue", "break", and a pre-mature
SF> "return" may also be considered as pseudo-gotos.
huh? same as perl then.
uri
--
Uri Guttman ------ u...@stemsystems.com -------- http://www.sysarch.com --
----- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support ------
--------- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix ---- http://bestfriendscocoa.com ---------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
