I've got an odd situation here and I'm not sure what to think about it.
I've had to pull several subroutines into it's own package since they
all have similar functions (as far as that goes) and I find that I reuse
them more than I thought.
My question stems from the EXPORTER directive. I've got one package
that does NOT include an EXPORTER nor exports any subroutines, yet it's
used by virtually all other parts of the system. I've never really
noticed it before, which is why now it's so curious.
I can't find anywhere that EXPORTER is optional, but also can't find
anything special about the content or syntax, etc about the package that
doesn't use it.
So, should I use it? Does it really matter in small apps? What am I
missing here?
--
Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma...@abemblem.com
Linux marius.homelinux 3.4.6-1.fc16.x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
