Thank for clarification. But one little drak spot:
> &FOO is NOT a bareword. Moreso, &FOO supercedes the empty prototype. > > Thus, accessing constants via &CONST is slower than, and not the same > process as, accessing it via CONST (or +CONST or CONST()). Is there any difference between CONST and CONST()? What is +CONST? thanks, -- Balazs Pozsar. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
