On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 05:48 , Bruno Figueira wrote:
[..] > > I guess that from this point you can improve your scripts. A socket > connection is just an interface between two scripts/applications. You'll > have to build your protocols above this "layer" so that one side is making > resquets and and other is providing the answers. That's a client/server > application. [..] good Point and it should be underlined - getting the socket connection to work is one thing - getting a protocol specification for what gets PASSED on that connection is a totatlly differnt ballyWick all together.... > You actually don't need to use a client a this time. Certainly you can, > but, > to make this simpler, just telnet to the server in that port (telnet > 192.168.1.120 9500) and issue commands. Their output will return to you. > Pretty unsafe... p1: in general we agree that 'telnet' connections are subSafe. p2: but minor nit here: just a reminder: http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1918.html the 192.168.0.0 IP address space is 'reserved' and hence not on the 'internet' - so your worst threat here is that someone inside of your own 'NAT' "group" will mis use your code. ciao drieux --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]