On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 08:41 , Jenda Krynicky wrote:
[..]
> Yes, if you can use that I fully agree you should, but if you have
> some html "template" you fill in you have to make sure you escape
> your data yourself :-)
the horrors of 'maintaining' code that should have started with
CGI.pm to have begun with???? Keep kobbling, we do not have time
to go back and fix the root cause problem????
> But of course as always you have to make sure you do not quote
> twice ... but that's a smaller bug since that's easier to find :-)
why does this sound like G. Spencer Brown's "The law of forms"???
It would seem that the current CGI.pm should not
retranslation of " into " - or am I being naive?
Also, while I like Nikola's generalized solution - I have
decided that the general idea of
$page_o_html .= <things that add onto it>
allows me to be more flexible so that I can 'dump out' the
page at different stages as I try to figure out what this
or that Module gives me as 'features' for doing CGI/mod_perl
stuff....
ciao
drieux
---
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
