On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 05:35 PM, drieux wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 01:12 , drieux wrote: > >> >> thought I would formalize the play a bit, and see >> what folks think about: >> >> http://www.wetware.com/drieux/CS/lang/Perl/Beginners/RegEx/HowPatternsEvolve. >> txt > > > http://www.wetware.com/drieux/pbl/RegEx/HowPatternsEvolve.txt > > sorry about that folks. > > this friendly mailer forces line wraps - so a simpler > work around at this point was to put the symbolic link > in on the webServer - update the <base href....> > and move on.... someone pointed out it stays intact if you enclose url in matching '<' and '>' > So now that I am older and wiser - what is the orthodox > and canonical partitioning of classical perl problems? > > ciao > drieux > > --- > > Given a choice between a 10th level indentation problem > with regards to variable scoping and regular expresseions > XOR formalizing, as provable, the two functions > > f(x) - resolve for all persons x whether they are members of > the set "Real Anti-Communists[tm]" or "Kook Anti-Communists" > or Red Hordes > > g(p) - that resolves for all propositions whether this is > an element of either of the above or merely > Red Communist Propoganda > > what was that problem with a RegEx you wanted fixed????? > That at least can be shown to be solvable.... > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
