On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 01:02 , John W. Krahn wrote:
> Felix Geerinckx wrote:
>> on Wed, 15 May 2002 03:12:15 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote:
[..]
>>> if ( $val =~ /^\d+/ and $val > 0 and $val <11) {
>>
>> Not good enough.
>>
>> $val = 3.141592654;
>>
>> is perfectly numeric but fails your /^\d+/.
john - I think he was actually referring to the URL one where I had
used the tighter standard RegEx:
/^\d+$/
and clearly his feverish brow rushed to type, and mistyped
just a bit....
> No it doesn't
>
> $ perl -le'
> $val = 3.141592654;
> if ( $val =~ /^\d+/ and $val > 0 and $val <11) {
> print "True" }
> else {
> print "False" }
> '
> True
<WayKamp voice=SouthernBelle mince=TRUE curtsey=deep fan=LargePeeCock >
how galant - to try to rescue me from that BRUTE!
but only technically correct.
since if you set
$val = "3.145BOB";
you will notice that this would slide through as true.
but would be considered as FALSE as 3.14
if ( $val =~ /^\d+$/ and $val > 0 and $val <11) {
so the shift to using the is_numeric() as that
really really brutish cad suggested.....
</WayKamp>
ciao
drieux
---
Do Not Try This At Home BOYS and Girls.
These are Professional Drag Queens using
Very Very Very Special safety equipment....
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
