<snip>
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 09:05, Jonathan E. Paton wrote:
> --- Pete Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a hackish tendancy when referring to the 'use' keyword
> to use the form:
>
> use confusion;
>
> why? Because it is Perl's way of loading modules - this would
> be a pragma (like strict and warnings). Of course, we need to
> get you to use:
>
> no confusion;
</snip>
or you could use the less module (I think it has been part of Perl since
5.6):
<example>
#!/usr/bin/perl
use less confusion;
print "Eschew obfuscation.\n"
</example>
If your version of Perl doesn't have the less module here is a copy of
what is in my version:
<file name="less.pm">
package less;
=head1 NAME
less - perl pragma to request less of something from the compiler
=head1 SYNOPSIS
use less; # unimplemented
=head1 DESCRIPTION
Currently unimplemented, this may someday be a compiler directive
to make certain trade-offs, such as perhaps
use less 'memory';
use less 'CPU';
use less 'fat';
=cut
1;
</file>
--
Today is Sweetmorn the 5th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3168
Umlaut Zebra �ber alles!
Today is also Syaday
Missile Address: 33:48:3.521N 84:23:34.786W
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
