<snip> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 09:05, Jonathan E. Paton wrote: > --- Pete Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is a hackish tendancy when referring to the 'use' keyword > to use the form: > > use confusion; > > why? Because it is Perl's way of loading modules - this would > be a pragma (like strict and warnings). Of course, we need to > get you to use: > > no confusion; </snip>
or you could use the less module (I think it has been part of Perl since 5.6): <example> #!/usr/bin/perl use less confusion; print "Eschew obfuscation.\n" </example> If your version of Perl doesn't have the less module here is a copy of what is in my version: <file name="less.pm"> package less; =head1 NAME less - perl pragma to request less of something from the compiler =head1 SYNOPSIS use less; # unimplemented =head1 DESCRIPTION Currently unimplemented, this may someday be a compiler directive to make certain trade-offs, such as perhaps use less 'memory'; use less 'CPU'; use less 'fat'; =cut 1; </file> -- Today is Sweetmorn the 5th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3168 Umlaut Zebra über alles! Today is also Syaday Missile Address: 33:48:3.521N 84:23:34.786W -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]