<snip>
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 09:05, Jonathan E. Paton wrote:
>  --- Pete Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> There is a hackish tendancy when referring to the 'use' keyword
> to use the form:
> 
> use confusion;
> 
> why?  Because it is Perl's way of loading modules - this would
> be a pragma (like strict and warnings).  Of course, we need to
> get you to use:
> 
> no confusion;
</snip>

or you could use the less module (I think it has been part of Perl since
5.6):

<example>

#!/usr/bin/perl

use less confusion;

print "Eschew obfuscation.\n"
</example>

If your version of Perl doesn't have the less module here is a copy of
what is in my version:

<file name="less.pm">
package less;

=head1 NAME

less - perl pragma to request less of something from the compiler

=head1 SYNOPSIS

    use less;  # unimplemented

=head1 DESCRIPTION

Currently unimplemented, this may someday be a compiler directive
to make certain trade-offs, such as perhaps

    use less 'memory';
    use less 'CPU';
    use less 'fat';


=cut

1;
</file>
 
-- 
Today is Sweetmorn the 5th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3168
Umlaut Zebra über alles!
Today is also Syaday
Missile Address: 33:48:3.521N  84:23:34.786W


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to