Timothy, et al -- ...and then Timothy Johnson said... % % Ok, I finally got a chance to test it, and the problem with my code is that % split expects a scalar as the second argument. This does work: % % ($temp) = $fullpath =~ m:/mp3/(.+):; % @working = split /\//,$temp; % % because it is taking the list returned by the match and assigning it to the % list with $temp as the only element. If I did this:
Hmmm... OK, so that explains it, but I still don't get it... So the match is going to spit out a scalar but in order to use it you have to capture it in a list context? % % $temp = $fullpath =~ m:/mp3/(.+):; % @working = split /\//,$temp; % % then @working would be 1 because $temp is evaluating the list in scalar % context, which returns the number of elements. I saw that. % DISCLAIMER: Someone please correct me if I am not using the appropriate % terminology. The upside of what I mean is that if you do a $scalar = % @array, then the variable $scalar now has the value of the number of % elements in the array. Right; that sounds familiar. % % Anyhoo, now we know why my suggestion didn't work. What we need to do, then % is give split the first element of the list. Try this: % % @working = split(/\//,($fullpath =~ m:/mp3/(.+):)[0]); That works perfectly, but I'm still fuzzy. So we match $fullpath and we have to put it in () to bind the =~ properly, I suppose, and *that* is what messes us up when we try to split and so we have to extract a scalar from that list, and we do that with [0], right? I tried {} and [] and nothing and none of them bound the =~ properly, so it looks like () is the only way to do that. Is there a way to bind that won't force a list context? Thanks a bunch! & TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg25722/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature