I inherited these packages and trying to find nice ways to steal some
code until I am able to rewrite the whole thing.
You are providing valuable guidance and I will try the 'use lib'
variation that you mentioned.
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:55:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote:
<snip>
>this is what leads me to my interest since you can pull
>the trick off with
>
> package A;
> #use B;
> #use C qw/:std/;
> #use D;
>
>so that you will not have to go through the 'use' time evaluation
>that you have B,C,D packages and hence can cheat around with
>
> my $got_answer = A::neat_function(@arglist);
>
>If this is your set of packages - and you are in the 'development
>phase' - there are other tricks you can play with here - such as
>the 'use lib' variations.
>
>When i was playing around with the DTK::Net::Web and DTK::Net::DI704
>modules I found it simpler to have the 'rack and stack' of
>
> use lib "/Users/drieux/perl/DTK/Net/blib/lib";
> use lib "/Users/drieux/perl/DTK/Net/Web/blib/lib";
> use lib "/Users/drieux/perl/DTK/Net/DI704/blib/lib";
> use lib "$ENV{HOME}/lib/perl";
>
>in the basic test code - since that would be where I would
>'find' the *.pm files after running the top level make....
>
>run the test code - if it worked, procede to the next round
>of development - new test code - maybe it did not work,
>say 'crude things', fix bug in test code or appropriate module
>run the make... run the test....
>
>ciao
>drieux
>
>http://www.wetware.com/drieux/pbl/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
