Paul, Do you know of a way to reverse the output of perlcc back to the source code?
Because I've searched for a way and I'm under the impression it is not reversable. Also, I figure why not try my best to hide all evidence of what language I'm using. I try to make it as difficult as possible to determine the language. Not to mention the group of competitors i'm hidding the code from are windows c programmers with limited FreeBSD expirience. So I feel this is a good tactic. Disguising the code as compiled c. I don't believe the compiled code runs any faster but it must at least save some cpu usage. Not having to run through the perl interpreter must save some memory. I seems logical that it would be more efficient for the computer to run compiled code, than to make it interpret source code. And I do believe that compiling the code makes it more secure than any other method. I have been able to unwind encrypted perl scripts which use filter::decrypt very easily so I choose perlcc as my way of hiding the source. If you know something about perlcc that makes it vulnerable to hackers please share with us, Thanks Paul, Tony -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
