-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: perl vs tcl?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:14:51 -0600
From: Sean Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Timothy Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <C0FD5BECE2F0C84EAA97D7300A500D50046DD3F0@SMILEY>



No gui programming. I think it's used more for logic than anything else. Not really for string manipulation. It's hard to explain because the program is so huge, no one person really knows everything about it. It seems to be more for extending the programs functionality so that we don't have to constantly recompile, so I guess to answer your question, I would have to say a little bit of everything. Sorry to be so broad, but I don't know how to explain it any other way.

Timothy Johnson wrote:

I think that before anyone can tell you whether it's better, you might have
to explain what you're trying to do. Are you trying to create a GUI for a
program? Are you parsing text? etc, etc...

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl vs tcl?


I'm trying to argue my somewhat biased opinion that perl is better than tcl. I want to embed perl in a c program we use because of it's speed and object oriented nature. They want to use tcl because they don't know perl and are comfortable with tcl. I'm not as familiar with tcl as I am with perl, so I'm not able to argue my point very well, so we have a 'tastes great...less filling' argument going. Any experts out there that actually know why perl is/isn't better than tcl?

Sean Rowe





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to